:: Netmarcos' Notes ::
Musings and rambling commentary on current events, politics, music, and other cultural issues mixed with a few personal references.
| [:: (re)search ::] | |
|---|---|
| :: google :: | |
| :: Dog Pile:: | |
| :: Charters of Freedom :: | |
| :: ThomasPaine.org :: | |
| [:: news and opinion ::] | |
| :: Opinion Journal :: | |
| :: National Review Online :: | |
| :: FOX :: | |
| :: MSNBC :: | |
| :: World Net Daily :: | |
| :: The Drudge Report:: | |
| :: InstaPundit :: | |
| [:: blogosphere ::] | |
| :: Day by Day Cartoon :: | |
| :: James Lileks :: | |
| :: ScrappleFace :: | |
| :: Moxie :: | |
| :: The Dissident Frogman:: | |
| :: Insignificant Thoughts:: | |
| :: Dave Barry :: | |
| [:: España ::] | |
| :: Atlas of Spain :: | |
| :: EL MUNDO :: | |
| :: DIALNET::Búsqueda de articulos científicos en español | |
| :: Prestige: exigimos responsabilidades | |
| [:: archive ::] | |
:: Tuesday, February 10, 2004 ::
Another proposal to Gov. Romney for responding to the recent Massachusetts Supreme Court ruling on marriage.One overlooked possibility is for the commonwealth to temporarily get out of the marriage business altogether. Since the thrust of the court's reasoning hinges on a finding of presumed equality, the state can satisfy that standard by offering civil marriage indiscriminately to all or to none. In this regard, one of the dissenting justices noted that the majority conceded that the legislature could simply abolish civil marriage.
Intersting stuff. Read it all.
:: Mark 11:56 AM [+] ::
...
Comments:
Post a Comment
