:: Netmarcos' Notes ::
Musings and rambling commentary on current events, politics, music, and other cultural issues mixed with a few personal references.
| [:: (re)search ::] | |
|---|---|
| :: google :: | |
| :: Dog Pile:: | |
| :: Charters of Freedom :: | |
| :: ThomasPaine.org :: | |
| [:: news and opinion ::] | |
| :: Opinion Journal :: | |
| :: National Review Online :: | |
| :: FOX :: | |
| :: MSNBC :: | |
| :: World Net Daily :: | |
| :: The Drudge Report:: | |
| :: InstaPundit :: | |
| [:: blogosphere ::] | |
| :: Day by Day Cartoon :: | |
| :: James Lileks :: | |
| :: ScrappleFace :: | |
| :: Moxie :: | |
| :: The Dissident Frogman:: | |
| :: Insignificant Thoughts:: | |
| :: Dave Barry :: | |
| [:: España ::] | |
| :: Atlas of Spain :: | |
| :: EL MUNDO :: | |
| :: DIALNET::Búsqueda de articulos científicos en español | |
| :: Prestige: exigimos responsabilidades | |
| [:: archive ::] | |
:: Thursday, June 12, 2003 ::
I am just as fed up as anyone with the Clinton's and the media coverage they recieve on a dilay basis. In the OpinionJournal - Featured Article section today, the reasons behind the constant news coverage of Hill and Bill are explained with complete clarity.We'd just as soon move past the Clinton years, but if its partisans are going to rewrite history, someone has to keep track of the billing records. Now Senator Clinton has Presidential ambitions, and her memoir is being portrayed as an attempt to clear away the 1990s for her White House run. If she really wants to be trusted in the future, she could start by being more honest about the past.
I agree.
:: Mark 11:27 AM [+] ::
...
Comments:
Post a Comment
