:: Netmarcos' Notes ::Musings and rambling commentary on current events, politics, music, and other cultural issues mixed with a few personal references. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
:: welcome to Netmarcos' Notes :: bloghome | contact :: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
:: Thursday, May 15, 2003 :: Jim Lacey in the National Review Online has an interesting theory concerning the missing Weapons of Mass Destruction over in Iraq. Is it possible that there never were as many weapons as the Iraqis themselves reported due to budgetary sleight of hand within Saddam's own regime? Of course there are many other possible explanations for the lack of proof other than that of there non-existence which are mentioned in the introductory paragraph.It is likely that if Saddam no longer had a WMD program he did not know it. Why else would he endure over a decade of crippling sanctions? If Saddam had ended his quest for WMDs, it would have been in his best interest to open the doors wide and let the world see. By playing as the model citizen he would have regained control of his oil wealth and quickly been able to make Iraq a regional superpower again.
Comments:
Post a Comment
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||